right

Islam is founded on deception

In response to someone’s comment on YouTube:

you are totally wrong about Islam, you never studied Islam nor read the Quran or Hadith, all you said is falsehoods from sad missionaries like the Christian Prince , I recomand you to watch Ahmad Deedat's debates, and Salam
dude, you are zionist
Islam is the true religion , رغم عن أنفك

Difference between Islamic and Christian apologetics

With regards to Islam, I only quote arguments that are backed by Islamic sources. The same can not be said of the popular Islamic apologists. By today, it is already a well-known fact that Islam permits outright lying (Sahih al-Bukhari 2692, or 53/3, or 3:49:857) whenever it can be used to effect salaam¹, the Islamic concept of peace, where involved parties either become or stay as Muslims (Yunus 25). And guess what is the sole purpose of your popular Islamic apologists? Advancing Islam.

Sahih al-Bukhari 2692 لَيْسَ الْكَذَّابُ الَّذِي يُصْلِحُ بَيْنَ النَّاسِ، فَيَنْمِي خَيْرًا، أَوْ يَقُولُ خَيْرًا ُ.
Narrated Ummm Kult̲h̲ūm bint Uqba: That she heard Allāh’s Messenger ﷺ saying, “He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar.”

That’s why you always, always need to go to the source text, and read it yourself, instead of just trusting your favorite figureheads. This goes for both you and me. This is why polemicists like Christian Prince and David Wood always bring up the Quran verses and Sahih Muslim / Sahih Al-Bukhari etc. quotations from your Islamic texts and read them aloud. They literally read to you what your religion says. If you have issue with what they say, you literally have an issue with Islam. Don’t settle for the deception that your Islamic apologists are pulling over you.

Don’t be illiterate (أمي) like your self-proclaimed prophet SAW. Read, and verify. Do something he never did. Even the pagans mocked Muhammad because he literally took fairytales and legends and preached them as “revelation” from Allah (An‘ām 25). The pagans knew, because they had already heard the material before Muhammad plagiarised them. Muhammad did not employ source criticism (At-Tawbah 61). Be smarter than Muhammad, be wise my friend.

Both Jews and Christians knew to tell apart the counterfeit and the original. They saw it from miles ahead, and that’s why they rejected the false prophet, just like God had commanded them to do through Moses. (Deut. 18:22) Muhammad only ever managed to convert two categories of people: Ignorant people who did not have knowledge, and people whom he was able to threaten with a “submit or die” proposition. Well ok, there was a third category: He bribed some (Sahih Bukhari 4:53:374).

If you lack knowledge, you will go astray. (Hosea 4:6) My friend, educate yourself. Read the texts, don’t just settle for the explanations of someone who is religiously obliged to lie to you in order to keep you from leaving Islam.

Compare these two sets of verses (three from Qur’an, three from Bible):

The wordمكر makr is never used in a positive context, but always to describe someone who is sly and dishonest. Check the dictionary if you don’t believe me: https://www.almaany.com/en/dict/ar-en/%D9%85%D9%83%D8%B1/ And Qur’an says Allah is the champion of makr (خَيرُ الماكِرينَ). You could even say Allah is the source of deception. Guess which entity the Bible assigns that title? It’s not YHWH the God, that’s for sure.

My friend, climb above the deception that you have raised in, abandon the culture founded on death and deception, and come to the light. Abandon the counterfeit Arabian idol and the most obvious false prophet ever, and accept the love of the true God, the creator of the world, who so loved the world — you and me — that he sent his only son to die and raise from dead so that we could have life in him.


email 3mbijsqqQhwiDEt@02ikZi.fKfi, https://iki.fi/bisqwit/
Excerpt from a comment I posted in a YouTube thread about Islam.

See also: Islam comes from Satan


¹) I am aware that this particular hadith does not use the word salam. It speaks of reconciliation. Different word, same over-arching concept: Ends justify the means.

P.S. Anyone who tries to refute my points by referring to something Zakir Naik said, will be subject to ridicule. Zakir Naik is a joke.


Last edited at: 2020-01-25T21:46:08+02:00